Giving Cameras The Best Autofocus Possible, Autofocus From The Human Eye These University of Texas scientists took a cue from Mother Nature when searching for the most advanced autofocus design on Earth. Our eyes do it better than anything we know of, so why not model it after our own lens? “Johannes Burge, a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Texas, and his advisorWilson Geisler, wondered how it was that the eyes of humans and many otheranimals were able to focus so much more efficiently than most digital cameras. In a traditional autofocus system, the camera uses only one piece of information about a scene to determine whether or not an object is in focus—its level of contrast. Contrast, says Burge, isn’t always a perfect proxy for focus. But it’s worse than that: To determine in which direction to re-focus, a camera must first change its point of focus and compare the new image it captures with the old one, to determine whether or not the object in question has a higher or lower level of contrast. Often, the camera isn’t even re-focusing in the correct direction when it captures this second image. This method of “guessing and checking” is “slow and not particularly accurate,” says Burge. Burge’s and Geisler’s approach is different. As they outlined in a recent paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, their software algorithm cananalyze any still image captured from a scene and instantly know how to re-focus a lens to bring it into focus. It requires no before-and-after comparison. The way it works is that it takes an inventory of the features in a scene.” (via Scientific American, image via Flickr user vernhart - Creative Commons)
Pop-upView Separately

Giving Cameras The Best Autofocus Possible, Autofocus From The Human Eye

These University of Texas scientists took a cue from Mother Nature when searching for the most advanced autofocus design on Earth. Our eyes do it better than anything we know of, so why not model it after our own lens?

“Johannes Burge, a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Texas, and his advisorWilson Geisler, wondered how it was that the eyes of humans and many otheranimals were able to focus so much more efficiently than most digital cameras. In a traditional autofocus system, the camera uses only one piece of information about a scene to determine whether or not an object is in focus—its level of contrast. Contrast, says Burge, isn’t always a perfect proxy for focus. But it’s worse than that: To determine in which direction to re-focus, a camera must first change its point of focus and compare the new image it captures with the old one, to determine whether or not the object in question has a higher or lower level of contrast. Often, the camera isn’t even re-focusing in the correct direction when it captures this second image. This method of “guessing and checking” is “slow and not particularly accurate,” says Burge.

Burge’s and Geisler’s approach is different. As they outlined in a recent paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, their software algorithm cananalyze any still image captured from a scene and instantly know how to re-focus a lens to bring it into focus. It requires no before-and-after comparison. The way it works is that it takes an inventory of the features in a scene.”

(via Scientific American, image via Flickr user vernhart - Creative Commons)

Source: scientificamerican.com

206 Notes/ Hide

  1. pleasekeeplearning reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  2. lemlunay reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  3. niczka reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  4. alchymista reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  5. naturedashnurture reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  6. thelittlestred reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  7. jennykasabian reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  8. watarutsuchihashi reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  9. htiynk reblogged this from pithyaphorisms
  10. maybeeffs reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  11. bamboolee reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  12. spacewheredreamslie reblogged this from timeijunction
  13. timeijunction reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  14. pithyaphorisms reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  15. tokiowie reblogged this from jtotheizzoe and added:
    “Johannes Burge, a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Texas, and his advisorWilson Geisler, wondered how it was...
  16. polyopia reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  17. corruptedfuckingtyrants reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  18. ritalin-binge reblogged this from bloodyenochian
  19. tudovaievem reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  20. inthepressofeverykiss reblogged this from bloodyenochian
  21. kangaroojack2012 reblogged this from aklos
  22. sohanto reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  23. smooshyaguacate reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  24. chaoticrobotic reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  25. jonanainpajamas reblogged this from warrensblogdotcom
  26. warrensblogdotcom reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  27. andreasneale reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  28. exit200 reblogged this from jtotheizzoe

Recent comments

Blog comments powered by Disqus