It's Okay To Be Smart

  • About
  • Twitter
  • Science Links
  • Archive
  • RSS
  • Ask, I will answer (eventually)
banner
Hold on a sec, there!
nationalpost:

Internet addiction has same effect as cocaine on brains: studyThis is your brain on the Internet: Messed up where there should be connections for making decisions and having normal emotions.Results of a new study suggest people who cannot control, cut back or stop their use of the Internet have abnormal white matter structure in the brain similar to what is seen in cocaine and crystal-meth addicts.According to the study’s authors, as the number of people logging onto cyberspace soars, “Internet addiction disorder” — which is poised to enter the official lexicon of psychiatric illnesses — “is becoming a serious mental-health issue around the world.”The disorder, as described in the study published this week in the journal PLoS One, is defined as “problematic” or pathological computer use that can cause “marked distress” and interfere with school, work, family and social relationships.For their study, led by Hao Lei of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Wuhan, researchers scanned the brains of 17 teens and young adults, aged 14 to 24, with Internet addiction and 16 healthy “controls” of similar age.People were classified as suffering from Internet addiction disorder, or IAD, based on a questionnaire that included the following: Do you feel preoccupied with the Internet? Do you stay online longer than originally intended? Do you feel restless, moody, depressed or irritable when attempting to cut down or stop Internet use?

Yeah, yeah … internet addiction. I’ve got a significant problem with this claim, and this whole way of thinking, as do many others.
It all boils down to this: “Internet use” is not just one thing, it is a mosaic of behaviors. How can we claim addiction if people use the internet in so many different ways? Sure, there’s certain specific behaviors and tendencies that are manifested online that share symptoms with traditional “addiction”, whatever that is. But everyone uses the tool in their own way. As neuro writer Vaughan Bell says:

“internet addiction not possible because no single behaviour is associated with the internet. The concept is broken.”

The internet is not heroin. It is not a specific chemical affecting a specific biological response and eliciting a specific molecular feedback loop of reward, tolerance and dependence. American and European psychiatrists do not recognize “internet addiction” as a real condition in their diagnostic manuals.
Rather, I think we should wonder what is behind these curious claims, and treat that behavior. The internet is just an expression of a deeper neurological condition.
More:
The Guardian - Can You Really Be Addicted to the Internet?
Slate - The Addiction Habit (Are We Obsessed With Addiction?)
Meta-analysis of “internet addiction” studies shows inconsistent symptoms, definitions
(h/t to Vaughan Bell on those links)
Pop-upView Separately

Hold on a sec, there!

nationalpost:

Internet addiction has same effect as cocaine on brains: study
This is your brain on the Internet: Messed up where there should be connections for making decisions and having normal emotions.

Results of a new study suggest people who cannot control, cut back or stop their use of the Internet have abnormal white matter structure in the brain similar to what is seen in cocaine and crystal-meth addicts.

According to the study’s authors, as the number of people logging onto cyberspace soars, “Internet addiction disorder” — which is poised to enter the official lexicon of psychiatric illnesses — “is becoming a serious mental-health issue around the world.”

The disorder, as described in the study published this week in the journal PLoS One, is defined as “problematic” or pathological computer use that can cause “marked distress” and interfere with school, work, family and social relationships.

For their study, led by Hao Lei of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Wuhan, researchers scanned the brains of 17 teens and young adults, aged 14 to 24, with Internet addiction and 16 healthy “controls” of similar age.

People were classified as suffering from Internet addiction disorder, or IAD, based on a questionnaire that included the following: Do you feel preoccupied with the Internet? Do you stay online longer than originally intended? Do you feel restless, moody, depressed or irritable when attempting to cut down or stop Internet use?

Yeah, yeah … internet addiction. I’ve got a significant problem with this claim, and this whole way of thinking, as do many others.

It all boils down to this: “Internet use” is not just one thing, it is a mosaic of behaviors. How can we claim addiction if people use the internet in so many different ways? Sure, there’s certain specific behaviors and tendencies that are manifested online that share symptoms with traditional “addiction”, whatever that is. But everyone uses the tool in their own way. As neuro writer Vaughan Bell says:

“internet addiction not possible because no single behaviour is associated with the internet. The concept is broken.”

The internet is not heroin. It is not a specific chemical affecting a specific biological response and eliciting a specific molecular feedback loop of reward, tolerance and dependence. American and European psychiatrists do not recognize “internet addiction” as a real condition in their diagnostic manuals.

Rather, I think we should wonder what is behind these curious claims, and treat that behavior. The internet is just an expression of a deeper neurological condition.

More:

The Guardian - Can You Really Be Addicted to the Internet?

Slate - The Addiction Habit (Are We Obsessed With Addiction?)

Meta-analysis of “internet addiction” studies shows inconsistent symptoms, definitions

(h/t to Vaughan Bell on those links)

(via brooklynmutt)

Source: nationalpost

    • #News
    • #Tumblr
    • #internet
    • #addiction
    • #drugs
    • #science
  • 1 month ago > nationalpost
  • 849
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

849 Notes/ Hide

  1. deodevil liked this
  2. machine-gunkelly liked this
  3. liloubisous liked this
  4. family-separation liked this
  5. premednotes reblogged this from medicalschool
  6. metro-forum reblogged this from nationalpost
  7. hwmk reblogged this from medicalschool
  8. glittertwink reblogged this from medicalschool
  9. theresomethingaboutmary reblogged this from nationalpost
  10. eyes-closed reblogged this from scribblerofdreams
  11. ibelieveinmiracls reblogged this from medicalschool
  12. justaspecialgirl reblogged this from nationalpost
  13. boxxer-auction reblogged this from darkenergon
  14. jessica90301 reblogged this from nationalpost

Recent comments

Blog comments powered by Disqus
← Previous • Next →

Portrait/Logo

About

"When we remember we are all mad, the mysteries disappear and life stands explained." - Mark Twain

There's a lot of science out there. I'm Joe, let me be your guide to big science news, wondrous science visuals, analysis-izations and all the otherwise cool science-y things out there, with all the woo and BS filtered out.

One of Time Magazine's 30 Must-See Tumblrs - 2012

Elsewhere:
Personal Blog (in the works)
Contact me
Follow me on Twitter

Let's learn something together. Click the "Share" button to send a post to Twitter, Facebook, or Google+

I'm working to change the way science is communicated and restore it to its rightful place. This is an indie blog that takes many hours a week to publish. If you'd like to support It's Okay To Be Smart or just buy me a drink, please consider even a small donation. Together we CAN!

Want to see more great science-y stuff? Check out my LINKS page for some of my favorites.

Certified Science Ninja - Member Since 2010

Twitter

loading tweets…

  • RSS
  • Random
  • Archive
  • Ask, I will answer (eventually)
  • Mobile

Copyright 2010-2012 - It's Okay To Be Smart. Effector Theme by Carlo Franco.

Powered by Tumblr