… those bacteria that were using arsenic in their DNA? Not so much. In 2010, NASA shocked the science community with the announcement that a bacterium from Mono Lake, CA had been found to substitute arsenic (found in the toxic lake water) for phosphorous in its DNA. This finding, were it true, would have rewritten the rules regarding the requirements for life, expanding the possibilities for where terrestrial, and especially extraterrestrial, organisms might be found. In two papers released this week, though, that original claim has been refuted. The bacteria recovered from Mono Lake almost certainly do not use arsenic as originally reported. The original team is standing by their work, and NASA has remained quiet as far as I know. They probably have their arms crossed and are shrugging a lot with that look on their face. You know. Harumph. There’s a lot of room to criticize NASA, and the original research team here. They pitched a three-ring circus to announce the original paper, and reviewers and editors alike should have provided far more scrutiny. But despite these bad decisions and flawed actions, this is not a defeat for science or the process. It is a victory for science, an example of where we self-corrected our errors, and in the process enriching both our knowledge and integrity.  Here’s a report from USA Today with more on this long saga, and what we’ve learned.
Pop-upView Separately

… those bacteria that were using arsenic in their DNA? Not so much.

In 2010, NASA shocked the science community with the announcement that a bacterium from Mono Lake, CA had been found to substitute arsenic (found in the toxic lake water) for phosphorous in its DNA. This finding, were it true, would have rewritten the rules regarding the requirements for life, expanding the possibilities for where terrestrial, and especially extraterrestrial, organisms might be found.

In two papers released this week, though, that original claim has been refuted. The bacteria recovered from Mono Lake almost certainly do not use arsenic as originally reported. The original team is standing by their work, and NASA has remained quiet as far as I know. They probably have their arms crossed and are shrugging a lot with that look on their face. You know. Harumph.

There’s a lot of room to criticize NASA, and the original research team here. They pitched a three-ring circus to announce the original paper, and reviewers and editors alike should have provided far more scrutiny. But despite these bad decisions and flawed actions, this is not a defeat for science or the process. It is a victory for science, an example of where we self-corrected our errors, and in the process enriching both our knowledge and integrity. 

Here’s a report from USA Today with more on this long saga, and what we’ve learned.

317 Notes/ Hide

  1. vihu reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  2. peacockfuta reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  3. melanist reblogged this from angrybrownbaby
  4. angrybrownbaby reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  5. stacyesmom reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  6. miket457 reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  7. bioargent reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  8. squishiebaby reblogged this from lilclownkid
  9. lilclownkid reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  10. heartt-breaker reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  11. bluemiharu reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  12. incubator-jones reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  13. bornbygenetics reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  14. shewhodancesunderthemoon reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  15. theratos reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  16. bboysage98 reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  17. next-time-maybe reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  18. neuronsandneutrons reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  19. ataletoldbackwards reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  20. mybreastsareanocean reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  21. raddaf reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  22. the-white-raj reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  23. iwillbefrank reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  24. puckishsquint reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  25. rasputinsgypsy reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  26. ssa-aes reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  27. menaturally reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  28. corduroy-phdr reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  29. divineirony reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  30. dr-eeevil reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  31. emmabell42 reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  32. suryetta reblogged this from heythereuniverse

Recent comments

Blog comments powered by Disqus