Nate Silver used massive amounts of data, statistical analysis, and careful computational modeling to predict the Presidential election. And he was right. This brings up the possibility that maybe, just maybe, climate scientists are right, too.

627 Notes/ Hide

  1. tatrtotz reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  2. abdisuleman reblogged this from leftish
  3. madelinelime reblogged this from leftish
  4. leftish reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  5. sophiehatterlefay reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  6. newyorketc reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  7. whatsloved reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  8. samosass reblogged this from anjanana
  9. waycoolhacky reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  10. dissidentliberal reblogged this from thesoapboxschtick and added:
    Shit. Science actually WORKS!
  11. soulfullofscarlight reblogged this from wibbly-wobbly-timey-wimey2
  12. rocknrollrach reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  13. pentatonicadenza reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  14. kddunn reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  15. plasmadragon reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  16. modular-definition reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
  17. rcginger reblogged this from jtotheizzoe

Recent comments

Blog comments powered by Disqus