Can Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Save an American Icon?
It keeps smoldering at the roots / And sending up new shoots / Till another parasite / Shall come to end the blight
So wrote Robert Frost, in 1936, speaking hopefully of the American Chestnut tree and its fight against a fungal plague. The mighty trees were falling ill to toxic invaders, but naturalists hoped they would rise above the challenge on their own, fighting nature with nature.
This woody behemoth used to make up a quarter of American timber in Eastern forests. The might of these trees, evident in the photo above from ca. 1910, reminds me of towering redwoods, dwarfing the lumberjacks flanking their mighty trunks.
Unfortunately, Frost was wrong. The chestnut-killing tree fungus threatening the American Chestnut was accidentally imported by farmers along with a Japanese species of chestnut preferred by farmers at the time. Within half a century of hitting our shores, that blight had wiped out a quarter continent’s worth of old-growth American Chestnuts (a very sad Wikipedia entry catalogues the remaining few specimens).
But thanks to biotechnology and genetic engineering, William Powell and his lab at SUNY think they can engineer chestnuts resistant to the fungus. Traditional crosses with resistant species (like the Japanese species that started it all) haven’t worked, and forest management has proven equally fruitless (or nutless, to be precise). Powell and his lab have successfully inserted a gene into the tree’s genome that can break down the fungal toxin, and are spending a tense few years waiting for their saplings to mature in order to know if they may have created a way to save the species.
Becca Rosen takes a look at biotech’s fight to save the American Chestnut in a must-read at The Atlantic, check it out.
What I find so interesting is that the techniques being used to save this tree, and one day reintroduce it to the wild, are not that different from those that are used to create genetically modified crops. How does saving a dying species by inserting a gene differ from creating an herbicide-resistant soybean, or rice that produces extra vitamins? I have my opinions, but I want to know: What do you think?
Source: The Atlantic
155 Notes/ Hide
- lulerz007 likes this
- theblocko reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
- itcanbeover reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
- argyledestruction reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
- carelesswhisperers answered:The long term effect of genetic engineering differs from case to case. The only way to know if it’s good or bad is to observe that GMO.
- carelesswhisperers likes this
- scienceteecher reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
- unendingsea reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
- unendingsea likes this
- aysekandaz likes this
- kangarooabuse reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
- thatscienceteacher reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
- thatscienceteacher likes this
- bnh4 likes this
- genericlatino likes this
- cecilfckingpalmer likes this
- ascballerina answered:Saving a dying species….not to be defeatist or anything, but species die sometimes. It’s part of life. And for my part, I don’t eat GMOs
- adventureportal answered:I support this
- nyxthedreamer likes this
- algorizmi likes this
- mycology-and-movies-oh-my reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
- arnabocean reblogged this from jtotheizzoe and added:
- flyseaturtlefly likes this
- lagatitanegra reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
- lagatitanegra likes this
- seedysadie reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
- jeffsniffer likes this
- beardorado likes this
- kammartinez reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
- point-of-origin likes this
- anaxaver likes this
- doitninetimes likes this
- jspies72 said:The American Chestnut Foundation has actually come very very close to creating a chestnut tree that exhibits American chestnut characteristics with the blight resistance without genetic modification! Check them out online!
- noxiousearth likes this
- irrationalsense reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
- evameh reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
- engineerette reblogged this from jtotheizzoe
- goldentickettopussy likes this
- cornwheatontop likes this
- miikatash likes this
- lurkinmymind likes this
- wwbioteach likes this
- grimmchaz likes this
- fremotti likes this
- pteridomania likes this
- whenimreallyathundacat answered:It doesn’t differ much, save the consequences involved. one saves a tree, the other may have uncharted effects a generation from now.
- whenimreallyathundacat reblogged this from jtotheizzoe