It's Okay To Be Smart

  • About
  • Twitter
  • Science Links
  • Random
  • Archive
  • RSS
  • Ask me questions
banner

Astronaut Tom Jones: Unless the budget changes, Curiosity could be NASA's last great Mars mission.

♫ It’s not unusual … to look up into the skyyyyy

It’s not unusual … to explore the reasons whyyyyy

Is there life beyond this world? How did the cosmic past unfurl?

Cut that budget and you’ll see me cryyyy ♫

I had no idea he was an astronaut. Very cool.

But seriously. 

It’s up to the people. Demand your space program, and you’ll get it. If we can put one penny of our tax dollar every year in NASA’s pocket (and other science pockets), the sky is not even close to the limit. Because if we do nothing, then the sky is as far as we can go.


(via itsfullofstars)

Source: popmech

    • #science
    • #tom jones
    • #space
    • #nasa
    • #different guy by the way
    • #music
    • #curiosity
    • #budget
    • #politics
  • 9 months ago > popmech
  • 69
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+
This is the time for forward-looking research universities to invest scarce resources in computer science/computing—even at the expense of other engineering disciplines, if necessary—in order to ensure a vibrant, cohesive, and prominent computer science/computing presence and identity. This most certainly is not the time to scale back on computer science research and education.

Zvi Galil, Dean of College of Computing at Georgia Tech, sends the president of University of Florida a letter addressing UF’s decision to eliminate its computer science department in order to save money. (via explore-blog)

J- There’s a little bit of misinterpretation here in that UF isn’t completely eradicating computer science. They are “restructuring” the department to move faculty away from research, forcing many out, and putting the degree program under the control of different colleges. In a state that can apparently afford to build a new $33 million state college based around STEM degrees (the new Florida Polytechnic) and that has agreed to give UF’s football program a raise that would cover the entire comp sci department, one has to wonder where the priorities sit. 

It’s an outrage, and it doesn’t serve Florida or Americans well. Ars Technica has a more complete and even-handed report than the Forbes article being passed around. This would be a huge step back, not just for UF degree-seekers, but for the progress of science education.

(via explore-blog)

    • #science
    • #politics
    • #news
    • #florida
    • #computer science
    • #budget
  • 1 year ago > explore-blog
  • 66
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

I’m gonna throw out two numbers.

Percentages, really, to be precise.

1%

and 

26%

One is the amount by which China is increasing its national R&D budget. The other is the R&D increase that Obama requested in his FY2013 budget.

I’ll leave it to you to figure out which is which.

    • #science
    • #obama
    • #budget
    • #china
    • #stem
    • #funding
    • #policy
    • #politics
  • 1 year ago
  • 77
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

US science agencies dodge deep cuts, but it's probably just so the politicians can fight about it next year.

NOAA, NSF, NASA and the FDA all received modest increases, but there was a silver lining to many. 

NOAA gained enough funding to save a critical severe weather monitoring system, but faced uncertain futures for many of its other programs due to GOP resistance to anything that even rhymes with “climate science” (like the famed “Shimate Shmience” bill shot down last year … j/k)

Most analysts think this trend is just setting up an even tougher election year battle over science funding in the 2013 budget. It seems like both parties elected to save ammo for that fight and passed enough of an increase to fund necessities and save face. Unless you’re John Holdren and the OSTP, in which case you were punished for even remotely considering talking to China about science collaboration, you know a sign of international cooperation and all that dirty stuff.

But unless we continue to increase these budgets in pace with our international competitors (like China), we could hurt ourselves by not doing enough. Next year is gonna be fireworks.

    • #science
    • #politics
    • #budget
  • 1 year ago
  • 133
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

Xenophopic GOP Congressfolks Slash Budget of White House Science Office . . . Because They Wanted to Collaborate With China

From ScienceInsider:

The implicit reason for the budget cut is an ongoing battle between House of Representatives Republicans and the White House over the threat to U.S. interests posed by collaborations with China in high-tech sectors such as space, energy, computing, and advanced manufacturing. Representative Frank Wolf (R-VA), who chairs the House spending panel that oversees NASA as well as OSTP, inserted language into the final 2011 spending bill blocking both agencies from using money to pursue such activities.

After science adviser and OSTP Director John Holdren acknowledged holding joint meetings with Chinese officials shortly after the ban went into effect this spring, Wolf took the next step and won House support this summer for a 55% cut in OSTP’s budget.

    • #science
    • #politics
    • #news
    • #ostp
    • #budget
    • #gop
    • #xenophobes
  • 1 year ago
  • 133
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

Senate Panel Cuts NSF Budget by $162 Million

“We’ve gone beyond frugality and are into austerity. … We didn’t want to do this, but that’s the way the world is.” - Sen. Barbara Mikuski (D-MD)

This is sad, sad news. Sen. Mikuski has been a champion of science for a long time, but when her committee gets their budget allocation slashed by a half billion (and $5 billion below what Obama requested for them), hands are tied.

While we may have saved a space project or two, this doesn’t bode well for basic research and innovation in 2012.

    • #science
    • #politics
    • #budget
    • #nsf
  • 1 year ago
  • 112
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

It's Full of Stars: It’s time to take action – again

itsfullofstars:

On Wednesday, September 14, the U.S. Senate subcommittee overseeing NASA’s budget – the Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies — will meet to “markup” the bill that will provide the space agency with the money it needs to do its job of exploring space.

The next day, Thursday, September 15, their markup will go the full committee on for their markup.


Somehow, the U.S. Senate has decided it can move quickly – to decide the fate of space exploration for the next year and beyond.

Please send an urgent message to your Senators asking them to keep our exploring spacecraft flying!

Action time for space-lovers! This is key to America’s innovation. Don’t let the budget fears of today cripple the science of tomorrow.

    • #space
    • #news
    • #NASA
    • #politics
    • #Budget
    • #USA
  • 1 year ago > itsfullofstars
  • 98
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+
Ditching the James Webb Space Telescope would be a turning point. And not a good one. As James Bullock of UC Irvine writes in the LA Times:

Walk through the halls of UC Irvine’s astronomy wing after dinner on a weeknight and you will find roomfuls of young graduate students, crammed into small desks, solving equations, writing computer code and developing innovative ways to analyze data. They do not have to be here. These are people with career options. They are scary-smart, creative and hardworking. Yet they have come here from all over the country and the world to sit in windowless offices and make a fifth of the money they could make back home or up the street. Why? They want to unlock the universe.
The United States is still the scientific light of the world. Ours is the society responsible for discovering humanity’s place in the universe, that we live in a galaxy called the Milky Way, one among billions of other galaxies stretched across the cosmic landscape. A hundred thousand years from now, if humans make it that long, the U.S. will be remembered for this, and historians will point to the immense contribution of the Hubble Space Telescope, with its miraculous visible-light images, the most detailed pictures of the cosmos yet produced by humankind.
Sadly, U.S. scientific leadership is beginning to fade. There is a sense of fear among our leaders that we can’t afford to invest in our future, just the kind of fear that endangers thoughtful debate about big-picture priorities.
One testament to our changing priorities is our commitment to the Hubble telescope as compared to its successor. The Hubble is, in every way, a monument to scientific exploration. Thanks to the Hubble, orbiting 350 miles overhead, we know that the universe began just under 14 billion years go. The age of the cosmos, once believed to be unknowable, is now available at the click of a mouse and has made it into schoolbooks in all 50 states. Astronomers have used the Hubble to determine the chemical makeup of planets that orbit distant stars and to discover dark energy, a mysterious substance propelling the universe to expand at an accelerating rate.
Many of the graduate students filling astronomy departments at University of California campuses, as well as Caltech and Stanford, have come to the state to explore and analyze terabytes of Hubble data. These data involve complex digital images, created in raw form onboard the orbiting telescope, and then decomposed into precise component colors. The Hubble beams this information to receivers around the world, where it is processed and made available for download. A graduate student working in Irvine can transfer Hubble images to a computer and then develop software to process and analyze the images’ meaning.
The goal is to squeeze information out of the gathered light that will help us discern the size, structure and chemical composition of objects that are almost always too far away for humans to ever hope to visit. The people who do this work are both creative and technically gifted. They must take what the universe provides — a shred of light collected by the Hubble — and discern implication from its signal.We want these intelligent, dedicated people to live in our cities, to make their discoveries at our universities and to raise their families — the next generation of bright minds — right here.

(via latimes.com)
Pop-upView Separately

Ditching the James Webb Space Telescope would be a turning point. And not a good one. As James Bullock of UC Irvine writes in the LA Times:

Walk through the halls of UC Irvine’s astronomy wing after dinner on a weeknight and you will find roomfuls of young graduate students, crammed into small desks, solving equations, writing computer code and developing innovative ways to analyze data. They do not have to be here. These are people with career options. They are scary-smart, creative and hardworking. Yet they have come here from all over the country and the world to sit in windowless offices and make a fifth of the money they could make back home or up the street. Why? They want to unlock the universe.

The United States is still the scientific light of the world. Ours is the society responsible for discovering humanity’s place in the universe, that we live in a galaxy called the Milky Way, one among billions of other galaxies stretched across the cosmic landscape. A hundred thousand years from now, if humans make it that long, the U.S. will be remembered for this, and historians will point to the immense contribution of the Hubble Space Telescope, with its miraculous visible-light images, the most detailed pictures of the cosmos yet produced by humankind.

Sadly, U.S. scientific leadership is beginning to fade. There is a sense of fear among our leaders that we can’t afford to invest in our future, just the kind of fear that endangers thoughtful debate about big-picture priorities.

One testament to our changing priorities is our commitment to the Hubble telescope as compared to its successor. The Hubble is, in every way, a monument to scientific exploration. Thanks to the Hubble, orbiting 350 miles overhead, we know that the universe began just under 14 billion years go. The age of the cosmos, once believed to be unknowable, is now available at the click of a mouse and has made it into schoolbooks in all 50 states. Astronomers have used the Hubble to determine the chemical makeup of planets that orbit distant stars and to discover dark energy, a mysterious substance propelling the universe to expand at an accelerating rate.

Many of the graduate students filling astronomy departments at University of California campuses, as well as Caltech and Stanford, have come to the state to explore and analyze terabytes of Hubble data. These data involve complex digital images, created in raw form onboard the orbiting telescope, and then decomposed into precise component colors. The Hubble beams this information to receivers around the world, where it is processed and made available for download. A graduate student working in Irvine can transfer Hubble images to a computer and then develop software to process and analyze the images’ meaning.

The goal is to squeeze information out of the gathered light that will help us discern the size, structure and chemical composition of objects that are almost always too far away for humans to ever hope to visit. The people who do this work are both creative and technically gifted. They must take what the universe provides — a shred of light collected by the Hubble — and discern implication from its signal.
We want these intelligent, dedicated people to live in our cities, to make their discoveries at our universities and to raise their families — the next generation of bright minds — right here.

(via latimes.com)

Source: Los Angeles Times

    • #science
    • #space
    • #politics
    • #budget
    • #la times
    • #jwst
  • 1 year ago
  • 210
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+
Is funding basic research at a federal level worth it? Is the National Science Foundation the right target for sweeping cuts? The numbers don’t lie.
From Sheril Kirshenbaum and David B. Lowry:

The research funded by the National Science Foundation has brought numerous innovations which have paved the way for entire new industries that have created millions of new jobs. Chief among them, the Internet, which the foundation helped to develop. While we recognize that cuts are necessary, stemming the very activities that drive innovation and ultimately boost the economy seems like the wrong way to get back on track.
Ask yourself, how much do you pay per month for your Internet connection? $20? $30? $40? More? Compare that to the cost of supporting the National Science Foundation: About $1.82 per month. Essentially, that’s the cost of one tall cup of Starbucks coffee where you might log on.
Is spending taxpayers money on basic research worth it? You bet it is. Especially, given the high probability that this funding will one day be instrumental in creating the Internet of tomorrow. More at The Statesman..

(via Culture of Science)
Pop-upView Separately

Is funding basic research at a federal level worth it? Is the National Science Foundation the right target for sweeping cuts? The numbers don’t lie.

From Sheril Kirshenbaum and David B. Lowry:

The research funded by the National Science Foundation has brought numerous innovations which have paved the way for entire new industries that have created millions of new jobs. Chief among them, the Internet, which the foundation helped to develop. While we recognize that cuts are necessary, stemming the very activities that drive innovation and ultimately boost the economy seems like the wrong way to get back on track.

Ask yourself, how much do you pay per month for your Internet connection? $20? $30? $40? More? Compare that to the cost of supporting the National Science Foundation: About $1.82 per month. Essentially, that’s the cost of one tall cup of Starbucks coffee where you might log on.

Is spending taxpayers money on basic research worth it? You bet it is. Especially, given the high probability that this funding will one day be instrumental in creating the Internet of tomorrow. More at The Statesman..

(via Culture of Science)

Source: cultureofscience.com

    • #science
    • #politics
    • #statesman
    • #funding
    • #budget
    • #austin
  • 1 year ago
  • 184
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

What is wrong with our sense of priorities when our government doesn’t understand that the bank bailout could have funded NASA for its entire history, all at once? When our government is primarily staffed with lawyers, who aren’t interested in truth so much as just arguing, where are we headed? And they want to cut the programs that actually give people hope? That provide real, intelligent jobs?

“It’s not that you don’t have enough money. It’s that the distribution of money that you’re spending is warped, in some way, that you are removing the only thing that gives people something to dream about tomorrow.”

I don’t wanna have to run for office or nothin’ folks, but you aren’t giving me much choice.

Neil/Joe 2020 … FOR SCIENCE.

(Bill Maher vid by TheFutureOfTheUS)

Source: youtube.com

    • #science
    • #space
    • #nasa
    • #politics
    • #budget
    • #neil degrasse tyson
    • #bill maher
  • 1 year ago
  • 192
  • Comments
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+
Page 1 of 2
← Newer • Older →

Portrait/Logo

About

I'm Joe Hanson, Ph.D. biologist and host/writer of PBS Digital Studios' It's Okay To Be Smart. Check out my "Episode Extras" here. There's a lot of amazing science out there. Let's go discover it together.

"Everyone's favorite Feynman of the Tumblr era" - Maria Popova

Joe's science book recommendations, from brains to biology to space to art to physics.

This is an indie blog that takes many hours a week to publish. If you'd like to support It's Okay To Be Smart, please consider even a small donation.

One of Time Magazine's 30 Must-See Tumblrs - 2012

Featured in The Best Science Writing Online - 2012

Elsewhere:
Contact me
Follow me on Twitter
(Email: itsokaytobesmart at gmail)

Let's learn something together. Click the "Share" button to send a post to Twitter, Facebook, or Google+

I'm working to change the way science is communicated and restore it to its rightful place.

Want to see more great science-y stuff? Check out my LINKS page for some of my favorites.

The Curator's Code

Other Places to Find Me

  • @jtotheizzoe on Twitter
  • Facebook Profile
  • itsokaytobesmart on Youtube

Twitter

loading tweets…

  • RSS
  • Random
  • Archive
  • Ask me questions
  • Mobile
Effector Theme by Pixel Union